Subcontracting CAMO Tasks: A Comprehensive Guide

Why Subcontract CAMO Tasks?

Airlines often opt to subcontract Continuing Airworthiness Management Organization (CAMO) tasks for strategic and operational reasons. The following scenarios highlight common instances where subcontracting CAMO tasks is advantageous. It is important to note that additional circumstances might also necessitate this approach:

1. Rapid Setup for Startups:
   • Start-up airlines with small fleets may need to quickly establish a CAMO organization.
2. Addressing Expertise Gaps:
   • Airlines lacking specialized in-house expertise may outsource certain CAMO functions to ensure compliance and efficiency.
3. Cost Optimisation:
   • Airlines seeking to streamline operational expenses might find outsourcing certain tasks beneficial.
4. Leveraging Group Resources:

   • Airlines within a corporate group may utilize the resources and expertise of a subsidiary organisation to handle CAMO activities effectively.

      

Contracting of Maintenance vs. Subcontracting CAMO Tasks Under EASA Guidelines

The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) outlines clear responsibilities for contracting maintenance and subcontracting CAMO tasks. According to GM1 CAMO.A.205, the following principles apply:

1. Hazard Identification and Risk Management:
   • The CAMO is responsible for ensuring all subcontracted activities align with hazard identification and risk management requirements as stipulated in CAMO.A.200(a)(3).

   • Compliance monitoring is mandatory under CAMO.A.200(a)(6).

      

2. Managing Complex Arrangements:
   • CAMOs must address hazards resulting from complex operational and maintenance arrangements. This includes managing interfaces between multiple contracted organizations.

   • Compliance monitoring ensures the validity and adequacy of contracted maintenance organizations' approvals.

      

3. Communication and Reporting Channels:
   • Effective communication channels with contracted maintenance organizations are essential for occurrence reporting and internal safety reporting schemes (CAMO.A.202).
   • Regardless of subcontracting, the CAMO retains ultimate accountability for the activities performed.

Permissible CAMO Tasks for Subcontracting

According to CAMO.A.125(d)(3), approved CAMO organizations may subcontract specific continuing airworthiness tasks. However, the operator’s CAMO must maintain overall control over fleet airworthiness. EASA’s AMC1 CAMO.A.125(d)(3) provides further clarity on what CAMO tasks can be subcontracted:

1. Tasks Eligible for Subcontracting:

   • Analysis and planning of airworthiness directives;
   • Service bulletin analysis;
   • Maintenance planning;
   • Monitoring reliability and engine health;
   • Development and amendments of maintenance programs;
   • Additional activities approved by the competent authority that do not compromise CAMO responsibilities.

    

2. Accountability and Oversight:
   • The operator’s CAMO remains responsible for the satisfactory execution of all subcontracted tasks, regardless of contractual agreements.
   • The CAMO must verify that subcontracted activities meet Part-CAMO standards through direct involvement or endorsement of the subcontractor’s recommendations.

Steps for organizing and managing Subcontracted CAMO Tasks

Our flow chart simplifies the steps required for organising and managing subcontracted CAMO Tasks. The following is a detailed description behind each step of the way providing a structured framework for efficiently and managing subcontracted CAMO tasks:

1. Defining the Scope of the Subcontracted Tasks:

   • Identify the CAMO tasks to be subcontracted based on immediate and long-term operational needs.
   • Consider both current requirements and mid- to long-term objectives to ensure strategic alignment.

    

2. Selecting a suitable CAMO Services provider:

   • Establish selection criteria to ensure the provider’s capabilities align with the airline’s fleet development strategy.
   • Evaluate the provider's capacity, competencies, and track record.

    

3. Determining Subcontracting Methods:

   • Option 1: Allow the subcontracted provider to use their own established processes and procedures. This approach is most suitable for established EASA-approved CAMO providers serving multiple operators. A detailed General Terms of Agreement (GTA) or Interface Procedures Manual (IPM) should formalize the arrangement. In this case the Operator is to ensure its CAME Chapter 1 (Continuing airworthiness management procedures) is reflecting the arrangement with the Subcontracted CAMO services providers and the agreed methods, processes and procedures.
   • Option 2: Require the subcontracted provider to adhere to the operator’s approved Continuing Airworthiness Management Exposition (CAME) methods and procedures. This option is often more manageable when subcontracting to subsidiaries within the same corporate group having same or similar continuing airworhtiness processes and procedures.

    

4. Conducting a Risk Assessment:
   • Perform a comprehensive risk assessment to identify potential hazards associated with subcontracting CAMO tasks. Mitigate risks using Safety Management System (SMS) protocols.

   • Ensure that the subcontracting arrangement does not dilute the operator’s responsibilities for fleet airworthiness.

      

5. Performing Initial Subcontractor Audits:
   • Before signing the final agreement and initiating services, the operator is to conduct an audit of the subcontractor to verify compliance with EU Regulation 1321/2014 Part-M and Part-CAMO requirements.

   • Liaise with competent airworthiness authorities to ensure alignment with regulatory requirements and best practices.

      

6. Monitoring Ongoing Operations:
   • Actively monitor the quality of services provided by the subcontracted CAMO.

   • Schedule regular audits and meetings as outlined in the GTA/IPM to address and resolve any emerging issues promptly.

      

Key Considerations for Effective Subcontracting

Subcontracting CAMO tasks can streamline operations and provide access to specialized expertise, but it requires meticulous planning and oversight. The following considerations are crucial:

1. Defining Clear Agreements:
   • Establish clear terms in the GTA or IPM, detailing methods, processes, and procedures to be followed.

   • Ensure both parties have a mutual understanding of expectations and responsibilities.

      

2. Maintaining Accountability:
   • The operator’s CAMO must retain overall accountability for fleet airworthiness, regardless of subcontracting arrangements.

   • Active involvement and oversight are essential to ensure compliance and operational integrity.

      

3. Ensuring Regulatory Compliance:

   • Subcontracted tasks must comply with EASA regulations and the operator’s approved CAME.
   • Regular audits and compliance checks are necessary to maintain high standards.

    

4. Fostering Effective Communication:
   • Establish robust communication channels to facilitate occurrence reporting, risk management, and issue resolution.
   • Frequent meetings and collaborative discussions help maintain alignment and address challenges proactively.

Conclusion

Subcontracting CAMO tasks offers airlines an opportunity to enhance operational efficiency, access specialized expertise, and optimize costs. However, successful implementation requires a strategic approach, with careful consideration of scope, provider selection, risk management, and ongoing monitoring. 

At Aviathrust we take pride in our Consulting and Compliance Monitoring Services. Whether you need an external perspective or a more active contribution we are ready to help.

Do not hesitate to contact us through our Contact form or by email on george.spiteri@aviathrust.com